Essay
Suppose two separate growth-accounting studies between 1980 and 2010 differ on the relative importance of the contributions of capital formation and technological change to growth in productivity. That is, one study argues that technological change has been relatively more important than capital stock growth in contributing to productivity growth, while the second study argues the opposite. How would you reconcile these two studies? (Hint: What did the discussion in the text about the Thompson bagel machine illustrate?)
Correct Answer:

Verified
The growth rate of technology is what is...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q86: Which part of technological change best refers
Q87: Which of the following statements is true
Q88: Capital is not subject to diminishing returns.
Q89: What test should be performed to determine
Q90: John Nash developed the growth accounting formula
Q92: The more excludable an innovation is, the
Q93: An increase in capital per hour of
Q94: Which of the following has not been
Q95: Which of the following best describes what
Q96: Increasing the stock of capital enables more