Multiple Choice
While driving home from work,Bailey's car is struck from behind by a van full of drunken college students. Asimov is the driver of the van. The resulting damage to Bailey's car totals $7,000. Bailey files a claim under his own auto insurance policy to have his car repaired,but his insurance policy only covers $6,000 of the $7,000 loss. Bailey pays the remaining $1,000 of the loss out of his pocket. Which of the following is a true statement?
A) Bailey has no legal right of subrogation against Asimov for the $1,000 that he had to pay out of his pocket
B) Bailey's insurer has no legal right of subrogation against Asimov for the $6,000 of damages it had to pay to Bailey
C) Both Bailey and his insurer have subrogation RIGHTS against Asimov for the damages he (Asimov) caused
D) Bailey has the right under the principle of indemnity to now sue Asimov personally for the $7,000 damages to his car
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: The parol evidence rule:<br>A) allows statements made
Q12: Which of the following is false concerning
Q14: Which one of the following is true
Q15: Shicara owns a jewelry store. In exchange
Q20: Luis arrives home from work one day
Q21: Actual cash value is defined as:<br>A)Replacement cost
Q22: If a property insurance agent goes to
Q38: Under a contract of adhesion:<br>A) subrogation is
Q80: What is the doctrine of utmost good
Q81: Jerry has a property insurance policy on