Multiple Choice
Roger Buehler and Dale Griffin (1994) had participants interpret an ambiguous newspaper report about the shooting of a suspect by police.Participants were then told that others had assigned 75% of the blame for the tragedy to the police and 25% to the suspect.Some participants conformed to others'' interpretations,while other participants did not.All participants then read the story again and provided a second interpretation of events.Results demonstrated that participants who initially conformed with other participants' versions of events _______,whereas those who initially refused to conform with other participants' versions _______.
A) changed their interpretations to bring them into line with others'; changed their interpretations to deviate more from others'.
B) later deviated from others' interpretations; changed their interpretations to bring them into line with others' interpretations.
C) changed their interpretations in a negative direction; changed their interpretations in a positive direction.
D) changed their interpretations in a positive direction; changed their interpretations in a negative direction.
E) did not change their interpretations; changed their interpretations to bring them into line with others'.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Persuasive arguments about _ are most likely
Q3: _ conformity is to the desire to
Q4: Does providing individuals with information about social
Q5: If you wanted to resist an influence
Q6: In essence,normative social influence arises from humans'
Q8: Muzafer Sherif (1936)used the autokinetic effect to
Q9: Which was NOT one of the instructions
Q10: In a conversation before class,you find that
Q11: Informational social influence occurs because<br>A) others can
Q12: Rachel is attending Catholic mass for the