menu-iconExamlexExamLexServices

Discover

Ask a Question
  1. All Topics
  2. Topic
    Business
  3. Study Set
    Smith and Robersons Business Law
  4. Exam
    Exam 44: Accountants Legal Liability
  5. Question
    Historically,privity of Contract Was Not a Requirement for a Cause
Solved

Historically,privity of Contract Was Not a Requirement for a Cause

Question 17

Question 17

True/False

Historically,privity of contract was not a requirement for a cause of action based on an accountant's liability for negligence.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q12: An implied agreement in the contractual relationship

Q13: In providing services for his client,an accountant

Q14: Zander decides to invest in the stock

Q15: An accountant who willfully violates Section 11

Q16: Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Q18: What are the requisite elements of fraud?

Q19: An accountant's records,including the data-gathering process followed

Q20: An accountant cannot be compelled to disclose

Q21: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted in response

Q22: Baxsen,Inc.wanted to acquire the common stock of

Examlex

ExamLex

About UsContact UsPerks CenterHomeschoolingTest Prep

Work With Us

Campus RepresentativeInfluencers

Links

FaqPricingChrome Extension

Download The App

Get App StoreGet Google Play

Policies

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines

Scan To Download

qr-code

Copyright © (2025) ExamLex LLC.

Privacy PolicyTerms Of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines