Multiple Choice
Students were presented with a description of a dispute between business interests and environmentalists (Eagly, et al.) over a company polluting a river. When they read a statement given by someone with a business background in support of the environmentalists, the students thought the speaker was more sincere:
A) but were not persuaded by his argument.
B) and were persuaded by his argument.
C) but did not find him more trustworthy.
D) but were more influenced by peripheral characteristics.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: Energy auditors were more successful in persuading
Q13: In a study by Hovland and Weiss,
Q24: Generally, high-fear appeals are more effective than
Q34: In a study by Leventhal, some students
Q41: McAlister's field experiment was successful in helping
Q42: In general, how successful are obvious attempts
Q46: One way of decreasing the persuasibility of
Q48: In the aftermath of the September 11
Q49: Fear appeals seem to function best when:<br>A)
Q50: Research in attitude change suggests that in