What Was the Court's Ruling in the Case of Image

Multiple Choice

What was the court's ruling in the case of Image Technical Services v.Eastman Kodak Co.discussed in the text?

A) That Kodak's intellectual property rights in patented parts established a legitimate business justification for refusing to sell those specialized parts to an independent service organization only if service of Kodak machines constituted less than 75 of the business of any independent service organization.
B) That Kodak's intellectual property rights in patented parts established a legitimate business justification for refusing to sell those specialized parts to an independent service organization only if service of Kodak machines constituted less than 50 of the business of any independent service organization.
C) That Kodak's intellectual property rights in patented parts established a legitimate business justification for refusing to sell those specialized parts to an independent service organization only if service of Kodak machines constituted less than 25 of the business of any independent service organization .
D) That Kodak's intellectual property rights in patented parts did not establish a legitimate business justification for refusing to sell those specialized parts to independent service organizations.