Multiple Choice
Fact pattern 16-1
Gretta is the CEO of a paper company built near a river used in interstate commerce although the state in which the company is located is land locked and not near the coast.Gretta determines that a significant amount of money needs to be spent to comply with the federal Clean Water Act.She is already in trouble with stockholders because of low profits and does not wish to spend extra money on pollution control.Therefore,she instructed employees to simply dump waste into the river.She was aware that she would be fired if the company received a heavy fine,but she decided to take the risk because she was in danger of being fired if profits did not come up anyway.Also,while Gretta believed that the Clean Air Act applied; Linda,a majority stockholder,told her that the Clean Water Act would not apply based upon the location of the plant.
-Refer to fact pattern 16-1.Does Gretta have any greater danger in this situation than being fired?
A) Yes,she can be held individually liable for the pollution since she knowingly violated the Clean Water Act; and she could face a fine as well as jail time.
B) Yes,she can be held individually liable for the pollution since she knowingly violated the Clean Water Act; but she could only be fined,not sent to jail.
C) So long as the majority shareholder approves of her actions,she cannot be fined or sent to jail for any environmental violation.
D) No.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: What is the Kyoto Protocol? Is the
Q25: Which of the following authorizes the federal
Q27: The Environmental Protection Agency was created<br>A) by
Q31: Which of the following is true regarding
Q32: Which of the following is false regarding
Q44: The management of hazardous waste is governed
Q46: Navigable waterways include all waterways used in
Q51: State environmental laws may not be more
Q52: Environmental law does not cover land-use regulation.
Q56: Set forth the Clean Air Act's four