If a Dispute Arose Under the Clean Water Act,and the Defendant

Multiple Choice

If a dispute arose under the Clean Water Act,and the defendant was a legal realist who believed that the judge was unduly harsh with environmental offenders,the legal realist is most likely to:

A) Look to the actual words of the Clean Water Act itself to determine a likely outcome.
B) Hope that the judge would not consider important issues such as clean water to human health,natural environment,etc.
C) Argue that judges should not use any factors other than the written law when passing decisions.
D) View the judge's personal and professional beliefs about water pollution as determinative factors.
E) Believe that the law itself is far more important than the consideration of those who are in the position to enforce the law.