Multiple Choice
Dunlop sold a number of their tires to Dew & Co.on the terms that Dew & Co.would not resell them below certain listed prices and that,in the event of a sale to trade customers,Dew & Co.would get a similar undertaking not to sell below the listed prices.Dew & Co.sold the tires to Selfridge,who agreed to observe the restrictions and to pay Dunlop the sum of $5.00 for each tire sold in breach of this agreement.Selfridge in fact supplied tires to two of their own customers below the listed price.Dunlop now sues Selfridge to recover the two sums of $5.00 as liquidated damages and asks for an injunction to restrain further breaches of the agreement.In this situation
A) there is a no contract between Dew & Co.and Dunlop.
B) Dunlop has no contractual connection to the contract between Selfridge and Dew & Co.
C) Selfridge is not in breach of the contract between Dew & Co.and Dunlop.
D) Selfridge has a contract with Dunlop.
E) there is a contract between Dunlop and Selfridge.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: Explain the phrase "an assignee takes subject
Q18: The effect of the doctrine of privity
Q19: Mary wants to be able to take
Q20: The effect of the doctrine of privity
Q21: When it comes to a manufacturer who
Q23: Peter was a coal merchant.In March 1962,he
Q24: Landlord and Tenant entered into a five-year
Q25: When can intermediate carriers successfully claim the
Q26: Landlord and tenant entered into a five-year
Q27: A third party can perform contractual obligations