Multiple Choice
Albert has agreed to sell his car to Larry for $14 000.00.Albert told Larry that the car had never been in an accident,was in good condition,and drove like a dream.Albert knew that this was untrue,but wanted to get as much money as he could for the car.In fact,the car had been in two accidents,had substantial frame damage,and could not be driven safely on the road.Assume that Harry had no way of checking on the condition of the car and that the principle of caveat emptor does not apply.In this situation,Albert's statement about the car is
A) a negligent misrepresentation.
B) an innocent misrepresentation.
C) a fraudulent misrepresentation.
D) a mere invitation to treat.
E) none of the above
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: It is a criminal offence for a
Q47: Benny,who owns a classic car,lives in an
Q48: With respect to sale of goods,the doctrine
Q49: Some consumer protection legislation provides for a
Q50: Explain the concept of rescission as it
Q52: Donna Brown owned a flower shop,which she
Q53: At times,the concepts of undue influence and
Q54: Cindy bought a car from Ben,who had
Q55: What is rectification? Explain its use by
Q56: At common law,a mistake by an innocent