Multiple Choice
Tim has a strong negative attitude toward nuclear power; Sarah dislikes nuclear power too,but has a much weaker attitude,One day,both get asked to donate to a campaign against nuclear power,According Holland,Verplanken,and Ad van Knippenberg (2002) ,what should be the effect of this behavior?
A) Tim's behavior won't change his attitude,while Sarah's attitude will depend on how much she donates,
B) Tim and Sarah will both change their attitudes to be consistent with the amount that they donate,in order to reduce dissonance,
C) Tim will base his donations on his prior attitude,while Sarah will not donate and will therefore become more negative toward nuclear power,
D) Tim and Sarah will both maintain their prior attitudes,because negative attitudes resist change even when they are weak
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: The RIM model may help to explain
Q6: The congeniality effect is the theoretical tendency
Q7: Research on selective attention has found that
Q8: Eagly,Chen,Chaiken,and Shaw-Barnes (1999)discuss why people show enhanced
Q9: When could one expect attitudes to lead
Q10: Kraus (1995)observed that correlations between attitudes and
Q11: Kraus (1995)found that attitude-behavior correlations are stronger
Q12: A police department is interested in detecting
Q13: Vallone,Ross,and Lepper (1985)found that participants with _,<br>A)ambivalent
Q15: Which of the following statements is a