Multiple Choice
The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:
A) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that the defendant would engage in this conduct?
B) Given this particular injury to the plaintiff, was it foreseeable that the defendant was the cause?
C) Should it have been foreseeable to the defendant that defendant's conduct could lead to this kind of injury?
D) Was the injury foreseeable to the plaintiff prior to the injury's occurrence?
E) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that this kind of injury could occur under the particular conditions that the injury did occur?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q111: Direct physical contact is necessary in order
Q112: A party can be liable for defamation
Q113: It would be a violation of the
Q114: True statements can be the basis for
Q115: Under negligence principles,a person is liable only
Q117: The defense of assumption of the risk
Q118: Sam,who weighs 250 pounds,calls his 110-pound girlfriend
Q119: Under the law,a tort can be described
Q120: The tort of misappropriation of the right
Q121: "Every dog is entitled to one bite",so