Multiple Choice
In the Palsgraf case,foreseeability was an issue.What question did the court address in the case?
A) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that the scales would fall?
B) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff (Ms. Palsgraf) that someone in the train station would be carrying explosive fireworks?
C) Was it foreseeable to the passenger carrying the fireworks that they might explode and injure someone?
D) Was it foreseeable to the railroad employee helping the passenger onto the train that doing so might lead to injury to Ms. Palsgraf or another bystander?
E) Was it foreseeable to Ms. Palsgraf that her injury would have been caused by an explosion?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Brooke has fallen asleep on the beach.Eight
Q2: False imprisonment is defined as:<br>A) being held
Q3: Assuming that statutory requirements are met,what is
Q4: Each person has the exclusive legal right
Q6: Powdersurf is a manufacturer of snowboards.Powdersurf is
Q7: The tort of assault and the tort
Q8: The following are required to be proven
Q9: Merchant protection statutes allow merchants to stop,detain,and
Q10: Proximate cause is also called "equitable cause."
Q11: If two (or more)persons are liable for