Multiple Choice
Don,who owed Dan $1,000 for his share of the cost of a fishing trip they took together two years ago,transferred to Dan a check for $700 that he had just received from a customer.Has Dan given value for holder in due course purposes?
A) yes, because accepting an instrument in payment of a prior antecedent debt is considered to be value given for holder in due course purposes
B) yes, but only if Dan still intends to collect the remaining $300 from Don
C) no, because the check was less than the amount of the debt
D) no, because the check was from a business transaction and the debt was personal
E) no, because Don had a pre-existing duty to pay Dan the $1,000
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q30: Terry has a business in which he
Q31: If payment is not made on a
Q32: Contract liability is another term used to
Q33: Which of the following is personal defense?<br>A)
Q34: Under the Uniform Commercial Code,value has not
Q37: Denise endorses a check to you as
Q38: Transfer warranties and presentment warranties are both
Q39: What is the consequence of a defense
Q40: What is dishonor in connection with a
Q70: An accommodation party who signs an instrument