Multiple Choice
On January 10,2011,Jonathan writes a check,payable to Josh in the amount of $500.00,drawn on Jonathan's account with MBNA bank.Josh,on the back of the check,writes,"Pay to the order of Brandi" and leaves the check on his night stand.Brandi comes to visit while Josh isn't home (she has a key) sees the check and takes it believing that it was indorsed to her a repayment of a debt.Brandi,then signs her name to the back of the check and hands it to Lori as a birthday present.If Lori sells the check to Faye,who knows nothing about what has previously occurred,:
A) Brandi would have a personal/limited defense against Faye.
B) Faye would be a holder in due course.
C) Brandi could buy it from Faye and become a holder in due course based on the re-acquirer rule.
D) Josh would have a fraud in the factum defense against Faye.
E) Faye would have no rights to the instrument because it was stolen.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: A person cannot be held contractually liable
Q73: Which of the following is true about
Q74: Why should a holder in due course
Q75: To qualify as a holder in due
Q76: Fraud in the inception occurs when a
Q77: Personal defenses are effective against all holders,whether
Q79: A purchaser cannot be a holder in
Q80: Who is discharged if a holder strikes
Q82: A holder in due course takes negotiable
Q83: A drawer or maker is generally liable