Multiple Choice
Ruggers is a maker of a range of highly popular cruise motorcycles.Tim buys a Ruggers motorcycle from a dealership and suffers an accident.While recuperating from his injuries, he learns that Ruggers has recalled all motorcycles it had manufactured and sold in the previous two years, owing to a previously unknown defect in their braking systems.Tim brings a product liability lawsuit against the motorcycle manufacturer and claims $50, 000 in damages.The defect in the motorcycle is found to be half responsible for the accident, while Tim's own negligence of traffic rules contributed to the rest.Under the doctrine of contributory negligence, what would be the ruling of the court hearing this case?
A) Tim can recover $25, 000 worth of damages from the Ruggers and the rest from the dealership from which he purchased the motorcycle.
B) Tim can recover $50, 000 worth of damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.
C) Tim can recover $50, 000 worth of damages plus any punitive damages that may be awarded by the jury.
D) Tim cannot recover any damages from the motorcycle manufacturer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: A tamperproof seal on a product is
Q19: A seller of a defective product cannot
Q38: The statute of limitations begins to run
Q42: Which of the following statements is true
Q43: A pharmaceutical company has disclosed a list
Q44: Mary was getting a ride home in
Q46: Clayton, Inc.is a toy manufacturer that has
Q49: _ is a doctrine that says automobile
Q53: Under the doctrine of comparative negligence, if
Q54: _ is a tort doctrine that makes