Multiple Choice
Leonard had incurred an injury due to a defective product on December 15,2011.He had purchased the defective product on December 15,2010 from Astralibra Inc.The state of his residence has enacted a statute of repose for strict liability to be three years and enforced the doctrine of comparative fault.Leonard decides to sue Astralibra Inc.for strict liability on December 15,2016.Which of the following is true in this scenario?
A) Leonard can only sue for contributory negligence against Astralibra Inc.
B) Leonard can only sue for comparative fault against Astralibra Inc.
C) Leonard can only sue for negligence against Astralibra Inc.
D) Leonard is denied the right to sue Astralibra Inc.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: An implied warranty of fitness for human
Q25: Kirsten just bought a car that had
Q26: Sengreen Inc.is a shipbuilding company that supplies
Q27: Which of the following is true of
Q28: _ is a tort doctrine that makes
Q30: Firecars Inc.purchases cars from Santeno Automobiles and
Q31: A full warranty is an example of
Q32: Which of the following is true of
Q33: What of the following is true of
Q34: Anthony buys an electric stove from a