Multiple Choice
Pursuant to obtaining a bank loan,Artcross,Inc.appointed William,an accountant,to prepare audited financial statements.William was made aware of the use of the financial statements.Upon inspection by the bank,the financial statements were found to be negligently prepared.Which of the following would be true in this scenario?
A) According to the foreseeability standard, William is liable to the bank for negligence only if he was aware that the financial statements were going to be used to obtain a loan.
B) According to Section 552 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, William is not liable to the bank, as he did not know the identity of the third party.
C) William cannot be held liable for negligence if the foreseeability standard is applied.
D) William cannot be held liable for negligence if the Ultramares doctrine is applied.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The financial statement prepared by an accountant
Q2: Which of the following statements is true
Q4: Violations of GAAPs or GAASs are prima
Q5: GAAPs and GAASs are used to determine
Q7: Why did the Congress enact the federal
Q8: The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)can
Q9: Privity of contract is irrelevant in lawsuits
Q10: Which of the following statements is true
Q11: Which of the following statements is true
Q56: Which of the following legislations makes it