Multiple Choice
Suppose Canada has a 20% tariff on the import of carpets,and Canada currently imports this product from India at a with-tariff price of $22.The with-tariff price of identical carpets from the United States is $24.Now suppose a free-trade agreement with the U.S.eliminates the tariff and so the no-tariff price from the U.S.is $20.Canada now purchases carpets from the U.S.Is Canada made better off from this trade diversion?
A) No,because it would still be cheaper for individual consumers to buy carpets from India.
B) Canada is not better or worse off.The gain in consumer surplus in Canada is identical to the loss in tariff revenue to the Canadian government.
C) Yes,because Canadian consumers are paying less for carpets and consumer surplus has increased.
D) No,because before the agreement Canada was buying from India at a lower (pre-tariff) price and collecting tariff revenue.
E) Yes,because Canada has diverted trade toward the United States.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q77: Many people argue that the imposition of
Q78: Suppose you are an economist advising the
Q79: A common argument for the use of
Q80: The diagram below shows the demand and
Q81: (NAFTA is currently being renegotiated,but was still
Q83: Which of the following methods of import
Q84: Canada and the United States have been
Q85: The diagram below shows the domestic demand
Q86: Which of the following states the "infant
Q87: An agreement among a group of countries