Essay
For the most part,Canadian courts apply modified principles of negligence to determine liability.Some critics of fault-based systems propose that victims be compensated through "no-fault" government schemes-similar to those already in place relating to motor vehicle accidents and workers compensation.Others argue that the law should impose "strict liability" in all areas in which plaintiffs have traditionally struggled to establish fault,namely,against manufacturers of goods or products.Explain the three bases for awarding compensation to injured parties and the advantages and disadvantages of each.
Correct Answer:

Verified
The traditional fault-based system provi...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q64: Explain the concept of absolute privilege and
Q65: An occupier has no liability whatsoever to
Q66: Even a trespasser is owed a duty
Q67: What do we mean when we say
Q68: Tort damages are often classified into<br>A)special and
Q70: A tort is<br>A)a criminal act.<br>B)a misrepresentation.<br>C)a breach
Q71: What is the difference between intentional torts
Q72: An innocent employer is vicariously liable for
Q73: An act of omission that is not
Q74: Joe recently purchased a can of shaving