Multiple Choice
A and B enter into a lease whereby A is to lease a unit in a plaza from B to be used as a retail men's clothing store.When the lease is drawn up and signed,it simply says that A is leasing the unit as a store.A now takes the position that he can have any kind of store and decides to rent out videos and DVDs,just like the Video and DVD store already in the plaza.In this situation
A) the court will attempt to resolve the ambiguity for A and B.
B) the court will look to the intention of A and B in entering into the lease.
C) the court will permit evidence that A intended to use the store as a retail men's clothing store and that B leased the unit to A on this basis.
D) the term store in the written lease is ambiguous.
E) all of the above
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Generally speaking,the parol evidence rule is hard
Q2: The contra proferentem rule is used against
Q3: In choosing between conflicting testimony,a court will<br>A)refuse
Q5: Which of the following is TRUE about
Q6: A court will sometimes recognize the existence
Q7: Words used in a contract may have
Q8: A business contract includes a term saying
Q9: When a condition precedent is not satisfied,the
Q10: The best way to ensure that terms
Q11: Is not implying terms in a contract