Sometimes the Court Will Imply Terms Reasonably Necessary to Make

Multiple Choice

Sometimes the court will imply terms reasonably necessary to make a contract effective.Courts may consider it necessary

A) to imply a term that is contrary to the expressed intent of the agreement.
B) to imply a term the parties have already dealt with expressly in their contract.
C) to imply a term necessary to encourage good faith in contracting.
D) to imply a term that the parties have canvassed as far as a foreseeable possibility for future dispute.
E) to imply a term not required to give effect to performance.