Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result in Pliva,Inc.v.Mensing,the case in the text before the U.S.Supreme Court involving the issue of whether the federal law requirement that generic drugs must bear the same FDA-approved labels as their brand-name counterparts preempts state law claims for failure to warn?
A) That federal law did not preempt state law claims for failure to warn.
B) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn.
C) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn based on strict liability but that failure to warn claims based on negligence could proceed.
D) That federal law preempted state law claims for failure to warn based on negligence but that failure to warn claims based on strict liability could proceed.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: What are the four basic parts of
Q22: Sam wants to sue a book publisher
Q26: Which of the following members of the
Q29: The European Union applies strict liability to
Q30: A seller should enter into a contract
Q33: Under the _ defense,a manufacturer is not
Q43: Which of the following is true regarding
Q48: Following several injuries,a manufacturer of a chain
Q54: The assumption of risk doctrine makes the
Q60: If the use of a product carries