Multiple Choice
What was the result in Smith v.Van Gorkom,the case in the text in which it was alleged that directors were grossly negligent in failing to inform themselves adequately before making a decision about a merger?
A) That the board failed to obtain adequate information on merger terms and would not be protected by the business judgment rule.
B) That the board was protected by the business judgment rule because there was no conflict of interest.
C) That the board was not protected by the business judgment rule but was protected by the merger business rule.
D) That the board was protected by the business judgment rule because fraud could not be established.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Which of the following are among the
Q30: Which of the following is true regarding
Q30: The duty of _ requires officers to
Q30: A(n)_ gives the person to whom it
Q31: Which of the following was the result
Q33: _ is a purchase of a dissident
Q36: A contractual provision insisted upon by a
Q37: Traditionally,a transaction benefiting a director's self interest
Q39: In evaluating a buyout proposal,the directors should
Q54: Maurice is a fairly new director at