Multiple Choice
Which of the following was the result at the U.S.Supreme Court level in SEC v.Edwards,the case in the text involving sales of interests in pay telephones and the issue of whether a moneymaking scheme falls outside the definition of an investment contract because the promised rate of return is fixed rather than variable?
A) That entitlement to a fixed rate of return did not prevent the arrangement from being an investment contract.
B) That entitlement to a fixed rate of return prevented the arrangement from being an investment contract.
C) That entitlement to a fixed rate of return did not prevent the arrangement from being an investment contract, but only because the underlying company went into bankruptcy.
D) That entitlement to a fixed rate of return prevented the arrangement from being an investment contract, but only because the underlying company went into bankruptcy.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Which of the following is not considered
Q9: Fact Pattern 21-1<br>Joan enjoys cross stitching, and
Q13: Fact Pattern 21-2<br>Alice and her general partner,
Q19: Which of the following is true regarding
Q27: The definition of "offer" under the Securities
Q34: Securities issued in a private placement are
Q46: Any transaction that involves an investment of
Q53: Which of the following is true regarding
Q54: Assuming Rule 504 of Regulation D otherwise
Q56: Which of the following may be sued