Multiple Choice
McKenzie purchases goods from Dormond. Later McKenzie goes to court and the court declares that the contract between McKenzie and Dormand is void. This means that
A) McKenzie can keep the goods and demand his money back from Dormond.
B) The court has declared that there was a valid contract between Dormond and McKenzie from the date of the purchase, until the date of the Court ruling.
C) Dormond has to return all money received from McKenzie, but McKenzie does not have to return the goods.
D) The court has declared that Dormond breached the contract.
E) McKensie can return all or the remainder of the goods to Dormond in exchange for reimbursement of payment.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q28: Explain the concept of non est factum
Q35: If the parties disagree over what the
Q36: Where a party claims that an agreement
Q38: A mistake in contract law can lead
Q39: If at the time of entering into
Q42: What is unjust enrichment? What remedy will
Q44: A pleas of non est factum<br>A) means
Q45: In executing its discretion to grant relief
Q60: What is the difference between a void
Q84: What are the two main types of