Multiple Choice
Carl is stopped at the U.S.border between Mexico and the United States.Border patrol officers become suspicious about his contradictory answers about where he was in Mexico.They ask for consent to search and Carl refuses.The officers inform him that they have a drug-sniffing dog on hand,who can sniff out illegal narcotics.They again ask for consent and Carl again refuses.They bring in the dog who immediately scratches at Carl's spare tire.This is how the dog indicates the presence of illegal narcotics.They open the tire and find a kilo of cocaine.Is this a valid search?
A) No,because there was no legal basis for the use of the dog.
B) No,because the search was carried out over Carl's objection.
C) Yes,because there was a valid consent.
D) Yes,because there was sufficient probable cause after the dog scratched at the tire.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: All of the following are exceptions to
Q2: The standard that law enforcement must show
Q3: Police stake out Carl's house because they
Q5: At trial,the prosecution is represented by the
Q6: All of the following are considered to
Q7: A paralegal can be disbarred for violating
Q8: The grand jury is responsible for indicting
Q9: A search warrant can become "stale" and
Q10: In which of the following scenarios is
Q11: Danny stops Carl on the street and