Multiple Choice
Danny obtains a warrant to search a local warehouse for "any evidence of illegal activity." He discovers some marijuana in an employee's locker.At trial,the employee challenges the seizure on the grounds that it was unconstitutional.Is it?
A) No,because Danny had a valid warrant,signed by the judge.
B) No,because the warrant stated that Danny could search for evidence of illegal activity.
C) Yes,because the warrant was too vague.
D) Yes,because there was no proof that Danny knew the identity of the employee.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The grand jury is responsible for indicting
Q9: A search warrant can become "stale" and
Q10: In which of the following scenarios is
Q11: Danny stops Carl on the street and
Q12: When the grand jury approves further prosecution,they
Q14: Another way of charging a person is
Q15: Danny is an off-duty police officer who
Q16: When an appellate court orders a new
Q17: Shortly after his or her arrest,a suspect
Q18: The prosecutor is employed in the same