Multiple Choice
Darrell is a narcotics detective and while reading an electronics catalog comes across an ad for a device that promises that it can descramble any mobile phone signal.Darrell orders the device and on his off-duty hours uses it to listen in on a suspected drug dealer's telephone conversations.Later,he seeks a warrant based on these conversations.Are Darrell's actions constitutional?
A) Yes,because he used his own funds to buy the device.
B) Yes,because he only listened in on his off-duty hours.
C) No,because the device was regular police issue.
D) No,because he did not have a warrant to use the device.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The "test" formulated by the U.S.Supreme Court
Q9: John is out driving one night and
Q10: One night,Carl is pulled over for suspected
Q11: The constitutional amendment that often restricts the
Q12: Obscenity only deals with sex.
Q14: It is not a crime to possess
Q15: A prostitute's "client" can also be charged
Q16: John has been charged with murder and
Q17: There is no difference between pornography and
Q18: Carl is pulled over for driving with