Multiple Choice
In re National Security Letter (2013) involved a San Francisco U.S.District Court which held that:
A) an NSL cannot be used for internet providers.
B) issuing an NSL did not violate the First Amendment.
C) the First Amendment is not an issue with regard to NSLs.
D) issuing an NSL violated the First Amendment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q21: One of the primary differences between interrogating
Q22: The USA Patriot Act:<br>A)eliminates the constitutional balance
Q23: Searches of private places without the consent
Q24: A general ban on the interception of
Q25: The U.S.Patriot Act:<br>A)tips the balance totally in
Q27: Sneak-and-peek warrants became part of a federal
Q28: The U.S.Attorney General must take into custody
Q29: In Demore v.Kim (2003),the Supreme Court ruled
Q30: Which are examples of total war?<br>A)The Vietnam
Q48: Sneak-and-peek warrants are a variation of no-knock