Multiple Choice
In the case of Wilson v Arkansas (1995) ,what did the court decide?
A) The police can never enter a home to execute a warrant without knocking first.
B) Searches of automobiles did not require probable cause because of the "mobility factor."
C) Officers can only "pat" someone down,and the pat-down can only be for weapons.
D) The issue of allowing police to enter without knocking was reasonable but the state courts were remanded to determine reasonableness for the use of a "no-knock" entry.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q9: Searches without warrants are permissible if there
Q35: Which of the following government interests are
Q36: The second question in the law of
Q37: Identify three exceptions to the "knock and
Q38: In U.S.v.Robinson (1973),the police had stopped the
Q39: Give examples of who can consent to
Q41: The voluntariness test for deciding when a
Q42: Which of the following is NOT one
Q44: The "grabbable area" allows police to search:<br>A)only
Q45: According to the Supreme Court's decision in