According to the Supreme Court in Michigan V

Multiple Choice

According to the Supreme Court in Michigan v.Sitz,involving sobriety checkpoints,detaining a car briefly at a sobriety checkpoint requires:

A) reasonable suspicion to think that the driver is driving under the influence.
B) probable cause to think that the driver is driving under the influence.
C) clear and convincing evidence to think that the driver is driving under the influence.
D) no individualized suspicion because of the importance of the State's interest in addressing the drunk driving problem.