According to the Supreme Court Opinion in Herring V

Multiple Choice

According to the Supreme Court opinion in Herring v.U.S.(2009) ,involving a search pursuant to an active arrest warrant that was later discovered to have been recalled several months earlier:

A) evidence obtained by officers who honestly believe they are acting lawfully is admissible.
B) the good faith of officers is irrelevant to the determination whether or not to exclude evidence.
C) all evidence seized pursuant to a search not based on probable cause must be excluded.
D) the evidence seized pursuant to the search is admissible if the police acted objectively,in reasonably good faith and the error in record keeping was negligent but not reckless