menu-iconExamlexExamLexServices

Discover

Ask a Question
  1. All Topics
  2. Topic
    Criminal Justice
  3. Study Set
    Criminal Procedure Study Set 1
  4. Exam
    Exam 10: Remedies for Constitutional Violations I: the Exclusionary Rule and Entrapment
  5. Question
    In Hudson V
Solved

In Hudson V

Question 49

Question 49

True/False

In Hudson v.Michigan (2006),the court held that failure to comply with the knock-and-announce rule is in violations of the exclusionary rule even if officers have a valid warrant to search a home.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q27: The deterrence justification bans not only evidence

Q44: The idea that evidence that has been

Q45: The first case to hold that unreasonable

Q46: The_exception says that illegally obtained evidence can

Q47: _ is another term used to describe

Q50: Which of the following is TRUE regarding

Q52: In using deterrence as the justification for

Q53: Discuss three of the findings with regard

Q54: Which of the following is NOT a

Q63: The idea that evidence illegally obtained by

Examlex

ExamLex

About UsContact UsPerks CenterHomeschoolingTest Prep

Work With Us

Campus RepresentativeInfluencers

Links

FaqPricingChrome Extension

Download The App

Get App StoreGet Google Play

Policies

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines

Scan To Download

qr-code

Copyright © (2025) ExamLex LLC.

Privacy PolicyTerms Of ServiceHonor CodeCommunity Guidelines