Short Answer
In Illinois v.Lidster (2004),the U.S.Supreme Court stated that the "Fourth Amendment does not treat a motorist's car as his______ _."
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q56: In United States v.Arvizu,the Court held that
Q57: The minimum requirement for an officer to
Q58: In pretext stops,the test for validity concerns:<br>A)whether
Q59: Warrantless searches of motor vehicles are constitutional
Q60: For Fourth Amendment purposes,mobile motor homes are
Q63: For Officer Franklin to conduct a warrantless
Q64: Stops for brief questioning that are routinely
Q65: New York v.Belton (1981)is significant because it
Q66: In Carroll v.United States (1925),the U.S.Supreme Court
Q110: Inventory searches of vehicles are valid but