Essay
In certain types of checkpoints and roadblocks,no individualized suspicion for any driver or vehicle is required.However,the U.S.Supreme Court's decision in Indianapolis v.Edmond held unconstitutional the use of a roadblock to detect criminal wrongdoing.Explain this case as an exception to the general rule on roadblocks.Do these roadblock cases allowing suspicionless intrusions establish dangerous precedents which will greatly weaken Fourth Amendment protections? Explain your position and provide examples.
Correct Answer:

Verified
In Indianapolis v.Edmond,the Court held ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q86: In which of the following ways are
Q87: Roadblocks may be used for general criminal
Q88: After a valid stop,the officer may ask
Q89: A non-contemporaneous search still must be done
Q90: Even if there is no probable cause
Q92: A_ is the brief detention of a
Q93: An officer has made a valid stop
Q94: Roadblocks because of a(an)_accident are constitutional.
Q95: Roadblocks and checkpoints can be an exception
Q96: The U.S.Supreme Court requires standardized criteria for