Multiple Choice
A suspect is involved in an automobile accident and is properly arrested for drunk driving.The police take the suspect to a hospital and a doctor draws a blood sample without the suspect's consent or a warrant.Blood alcohol content evidence is admitted against the defendant at trial.What did the U.S.Supreme Court decide in Schmerber v.California (1966) ,about the admissibility of this procedure?
A) This procedure did not violate the Fourth Amendment.
B) This procedure did violate the Fourth Amendment
C) This procedure did not violate the Fifth Amendment.
D) This procedure did violate the Fifth Amendment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Given current skepticism about the reliability of
Q19: What is the current position of the
Q20: A suspect has a Sixth Amendment right
Q21: A 2002 report from the National Academy
Q22: Define,compare,and contrast the Kirby and Wade-Gilbert rules.Do
Q24: A suspect has a right to an
Q25: One of the constitutional rights often invoked
Q26: A defendant who has been indicted has
Q27: During lineups,the lawyer's function is that of
Q28: The role of the defendant's lawyer at