In the Case of Crocker V Sundance, Mr

Multiple Choice

In the case of Crocker v Sundance, Mr. Crocker was an invitee to the ski resort. The Supreme Court of Canada held that as an invitee:

A) Mr. Crocker was responsible for his own injuries because he was intoxicated and Sundance owed him no duty of care
B) Sundance was responsible for his injuries because he was intoxicated and Sundance owed him a duty of care
C) Mr. Crocker was partially responsible for his own injuries because he was intoxicated and Sundance owed him no duty of care
D) Sundance was partially responsible for his injuries because he was intoxicated and Sundance owed him a duty of care