Multiple Choice
In an effort to improve productivity in its factory, a firm recently instituted a training program for its workers. One of the work crews consisted of 14 workers. Seven workers from this crew were selected at random to attend the training course. All seven workers selected successfully completed the training course. The remaining seven workers served as a control group and did not attend the training course. Three months after the training course, a foreman who did not know which employees attended the training course was asked to rank all 14 employees in terms of their productivity. A rank of 14 indicates the most productive employee in the crew, while a rank of 1 indicates the least productive worker. At α = .05, can it be concluded that training was beneficial in improving productivity?
A) Reject the null hypothesis; training is beneficial.
B) Do not reject the null hypothesis; we cannot determine if the training makes a difference.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q67: Parametric methods are _ more powerful than
Q68: Refer to the MegaStat/Excel output for the
Q69: The Wilcoxon rank sum test requires that
Q70: The Spearman's rank correlation test can be
Q71: Five years ago, the average starting salary
Q73: Which one of the following nonparametric methods
Q74: A readability analysis is conducted to determine
Q75: An e-business/e-commerce information technology consulting company wants
Q76: In a local ice-skating contest, there were
Q77: Which of the following statements about nonparametric