Short Answer
A fast-food company uses two management-training methods. Method 1 is a traditional method of training, and Method 2 is a new and innovative method. The company has just hired 31 new management trainees. 15 of the trainees are randomly selected and assigned to the first method, and the remaining 16 trainees are assigned to the second training method. After three months of training, the management trainees take a standardized test. The test was designed to evaluate their performance and learning from training. The sample mean score and sample standard deviation of the two methods are given below. The management wants to determine if the company should implement the new training method.
Is there evidence at α = .01 to conclude that the new training method is more effective than the traditional training method?
Correct Answer:

Verified
No, there is not sufficient evidence to ...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q81: When comparing two independent population means by
Q82: In a market research study conducted by
Q83: Two hospital emergency rooms use different procedures
Q84: Two different firms design their own tests
Q85: When comparing the variances of two normally
Q87: When testing the difference between two population
Q88: In an opinion survey, a random sample
Q89: In testing the difference between two means
Q90: Let p<sub>1</sub> represent the population proportion of
Q91: A fast-food company uses two management-training methods.