Multiple Choice
Justin buys a computer from a retailer and his son is injured when the glass on the monitor shatters while he is using it.He sues the wholesaler only and the jury determines that this was a manufacturing defect that existed when the computer left the factory and caused the son's injury.The jury determined that the wholesaler was only 5-percent responsible,the retailer 20-percent,and the manufacturer 75-percent.Justin can:
A) recover the full amount of his damages from the wholesaler
B) recover only 5 percent of his damages from the wholesaler
C) recover 20 percent from the retailer,but none from the parties he did not deal with
D) not recover because he (the son) was not the one who bought the computer
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q33: The doctrine of strict liability applies to
Q34: In the case where General Motors was
Q35: Damages recoverable in a strict liability action
Q36: The failure of a manufacturer to properly
Q37: A proper and conspicuous warning placed on
Q39: Failure to warn about a product's dangers
Q40: Smith purchased the latest kitchen counter top
Q41: The concept of "defect" is expanding in
Q42: What are sellers responsible to provide for
Q43: In a product liability action based on