Multiple Choice
Sean has a 6-year-old car which he bought 2 years ago directly from its original owner.Eight months ago he received a recall notice about a safety problem with the brakes.He never responded to the notice.Yesterday Sean was driving when the brakes failed and caused him to strike and injure a pedestrian.Which of the following is true in lawsuits against the car's manufacturer?
A) The pedestrian cannot recover due to the fact that the pedestrian was not using the car.
B) Sean can recover despite having received the recall notice.
C) The pedestrian cannot recover because the correction of a defect defense will apply even though Sean did not take the car in for the repair.
D) Neither party can recover if Sean's car was one of only a few of these cars that actually had a brake defect.
E) The pedestrian could not recover due to assumption of the risk.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q54: In a negligence action,all parties in the
Q55: In 1995,Congress passed a law affecting products
Q56: Little Bobby,5 years old,finds his older brother's
Q57: Contributory negligence is a defense to negligence
Q58: Greenman v.Yuba Power Products,Inc.is a landmark case
Q60: Strict liability applies only to products,not services.
Q61: Should plaintiffs be able to recover from
Q62: A wholesale distributor who is named in
Q63: The doctrine that imposes liability on a
Q64: Strict liability does not require the injured