Multiple Choice
Jack and Jill were discussing business over lunch when they agreed on the sale of some goods.Because neither of them had any paper handy,Jack wrote the following on a napkin: "Jill agrees to purchase from Jack,1,000 widgets to be delivered on July 1,2001,at a cost of $10,000,payable on delivery." Jill signed the napkin,although Jack did not sign it.Jack delivered the widgets per the contract,but Jill refuses to pay for them.If Jack sues Jill for the price of the goods,the most likely result is which of the following?
A) Jill will win because this writing is not sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
B) Jack will win because Jill signed the napkin.
C) Jill will win because Jack did not sign the contract.
D) Jack will win because the Statute of Frauds does not apply to this situation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q47: What is the purpose of the parol
Q48: The Statute of Frauds may not be
Q49: In December,2001,Mark signs a written consulting agreement
Q50: The primary significance of requiring only the
Q51: In a guarantee situation,there are only two
Q53: The "main purpose" or "leading object" exception
Q54: John is president and sole shareholder of
Q55: A written agreement was signed by the
Q56: The part performance exception to the Statute
Q57: The Statute of Frauds does not apply