Multiple Choice
Don and Susanne have both been accused of insider trading. Don knows that if he confesses while Susanne keeps silent, he will receive a 1-month jail sentence. He also knows that if Susanne confesses and he keeps silent, he will receive a 12-month jail sentence. If neither of them confesses, there will be insufficient evidence to convict either of insider trading, but there is enough evidence to convict each of them individually of obstructing justice, which carries a 2-month sentence. If both of them confess, they will both serve a 3-month jail sentence. This situation is:
A) an example of cartel behavior.
B) an application of the prisoner's dilemma.
C) not realistic because those accused of insider trading always keep silent.
D) not realistic because those accused of insider trading are never encouraged to confess.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q66: A Nash equilibrium is the:<br>A) payoff that
Q67: The prisoner's dilemma provides an explanation of
Q68: The equilibrium solution for the following
Q69: Why might the economy as a whole
Q70: Assuming the standard assumptions, in an infinitely
Q72: Consider the following payoff matrix facing
Q73: The prisoner's dilemma is an example of
Q74: The formal game theory model assumes that:<br>A)
Q75: The Nash equilibrium in the following
Q76: The prisoner's dilemma is a well-known game