In What Manner Could You Reasonably Expect a Court to Apply

Multiple Choice

In what manner could you reasonably expect a court to apply the parol evidence rule when asked to interpret the meaning of a nebulous term in a written contract?

A) Abide by the rule and use its discretion to infer a clarification of the term.
B) Disregard the rule and allow extrinsic evidence to resolve the ambiguity.
C) Abide by the rule and use its discretion to apply implied terms for clarification.
D) Disregard the rule and apply the reasonable person test to interpret the term.