Multiple Choice
Armand,who previously had no reason to believe he was in poor health,crashed his truck into a parked car after unexpectedly fainting at the wheel.Under these circumstances,why might the owner of the damaged vehicle be prevented from recovering compensation from Armand?
A) The type of damages was not reasonably foreseeable.
B) Armand has insurance and therefore is protected from being sued.
C) No tort has been committed by Armand.
D) Armand owes no duty of care in these circumstances.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Generally,supporting expert evidence is required to sustain
Q6: Distinguish between pecuniary and non-pecuniary losses.Which of
Q9: Which of the following is an intentional
Q10: What would a lawyer representing an individual
Q39: Provide a brief explanation of the circumstances
Q40: Which of the following is a valid
Q47: Contributory negligence legislation apportions responsibility among those
Q48: What is the common law rule regarding
Q59: Explain what must be valued by a
Q69: In addition to monetary compensation for mental