Multiple Choice
Why do astronomers NOT consider stars with masses more than about 1.5 solar masses in the Drake equation when estimating the number of possible stars in the Milky Way Galaxy around which planets could form that would support intelligent life similar to humans?
A) More massive stars would produce massive planets on which life would not be possible.
B) More massive stars would never reach temperatures sufficient to maintain life-supporting conditions on the surfaces of its planets.
C) A more massive star would produce so much damaging UV radiation that it would sterilize its planets.
D) More massive stars would have evolved so rapidly that an advanced civilization would not have had time to evolve and develop.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q7: Which of these is NOT a reason
Q8: Pioneer 10 and 11 carried plaques intended
Q9: Which of these accurately explains the likelihood
Q10: What does the acronym SETI stand for?<br>A)
Q11: What strategies and electromagnetic frequencies are thought
Q13: The Drake equation attempts to predict the<br>A)
Q14: Probably the MOST difficult factor to estimate
Q15: In which type of meteorite has evidence
Q16: One of the "quiet" bands in the
Q17: The galactic habitable zone is sometimes defined