Multiple Choice
What are the implications of Tsilhqot'in Nation v British Columbia,2014 SCC 44,for resource extraction and other intrusions such as pipelines on Crown lands that have been exclusively and continuously occupied by Indigenous peoples?
A) Resource development is no longer possible on such lands.
B) The Crown may continue to develop resources on such lands provided it shares revenues with potential aboriginal title holders.
C) Intention to develop such lands will trigger a duty to consult.
D) There is no impact unless the Indigenous peoples are able to establish aboriginal title
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: How does Canadian law provide for the
Q2: In contractual bailments,bailors warrant that the goods
Q3: The practical distinction that exists between carriers
Q4: The duty to consult is triggered by
Q5: What is a characteristic of a carrier
Q7: Which of the following is an example
Q8: According to property law principles,all tangible materials
Q9: What term describes the acquisition of ownership
Q10: Are property rights human rights?
Q11: Colleen booked two weeks' lodging with a