Multiple Choice
Casia,who had always been in good health,suffered a heart attack while driving her car and crashed into a pedestrian who in turn suffered serious personal injuries as a result of being struck.Which statement best describes the most likely outcome?
A) The type of damages was not reasonably foreseeable.
B) Casio has insurance and therefore is protected from being sued.
C) No tort has been committed by Casia.
D) Casio owes no duty of care in these circumstances.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q53: What would a court most likely rely
Q54: Carson is a security guard in a
Q55: There are many different torts,each with its
Q56: When an employer is vicariously liable,the employee
Q57: The nature of precedent is inherently contemporary,meaning
Q59: Explain what must be valued by a
Q60: What are the legal terms given to
Q61: Graham was in a hurry and forgot
Q62: Which statement best describes the distinction between
Q63: An employer can never be held vicariously