Multiple Choice
A health researcher was interested in the variation of patient recovery rates across four different treatment programmes. He was particularly interested in whether the treatment programme that the patient was in had a possible influence on the patient's recovery rate. He ran an ANOVA with the predictor variable 'treatment programme', which had three categories, 'Placebo', 'Drug X' and 'Natural'; the outcome variable was 'Patient recovery rate'. His ANOVA had an F-statistic of 98.12 (p 0.02) . How would you interpret his findings?
A) There is no significant difference in patient recovery rates by treatment programme.
B) There is insufficient information; the results of Post hoc tests are needed.
C) There is a significant difference in patient recovery rates by treatment programme.
D) The results are ambiguous.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: How can we decide whether our group
Q16: Imagine you compare the effectiveness of four
Q17: If the differences between group means are
Q18: Which of the following is not a
Q19: After an ANOVA you need more analysis
Q21: A business analyst was interested in the
Q22: A psychologist was looking at the
Q23: A teacher in a school was interested
Q24: The student welfare office was interested in
Q25: Robust ANOVA tests are able to work